http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20811451
Amusing example with respect to how PubMed handles authors
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20811451
Amusing example with respect to how PubMed handles authors
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20811451
Amusing with respect to how PubMed handles authors here
commentary :
RNA editing study under intense scrutiny
Debate highlights pitfalls in interpreting genomic data.
http://www.nature.com/news/rna-editing-study-under-intense-scrutiny-1.10217
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6074/1302.6.full.pdf
In response to critique the authors of the original paper suggest that there are aggregations of RNA editing sites and (ATTENTION!) deletion/insertions in RNA
Discusses statistics of revealing SNPs
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v41/n9/full/ng.436.html