https://www.cnet.com/news/succession-season-3-episode-5-recap-retired-janitors-of-idaho/
JetBlue 17% cancellation rate
January 1, 2022FINIS Smart Goggle Review – MacRumors
January 1, 2022Ergodic theory – Wikipedia
December 31, 2021https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergodic_theory#Mean_ergodic_theorem
QT:{{”
A central concern of ergodic theory is the behavior of a dynamical system when it is allowed to run for a long time. The first result in this direction is the Poincaré recurrence theorem, which claims that almost all points in any subset of the phase space eventually revisit the set. Systems for which the Poincaré recurrence theorem holds are conservative systems; thus all ergodic systems are conservative. More precise information is provided by various ergodic theorems which assert that, under certain conditions, the time average of a function along the trajectories exists almost everywhere and is related to the space average. Two of the most important theorems are those of Birkhoff (1931) and von Neumann which assert the existence of a time average along each trajectory. For the special class of ergodic systems, this time average is the same for almost all initial points: statistically speaking, the system that evolves for a long time “forgets” its initial state. Stronger properties, such as mixing and equidistribution, have also been extensively studied.
“}}
The Real History That Inspired “Star Wars” – HISTORY
December 31, 2021Alden Global Capital, the Hedge Fund Killing Newspapers – The Atlantic
December 31, 2021Good point… but the underlying problem is that readers don’t want to pay well for quality reporting & good writing.
Reinhold Bertlmann – Wikipedia
December 30, 2021https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinhold_Bertlmann
QT:{{”
In 1978 Bertlmann went to CERN, where he worked together with J. S. Bell.[1] Bertlmann always wore socks of different colours. In 1981 Bell wrote the article “Bertlmann’s socks and the nature of reality”, where he compared the EPR paradox with Bertlmann’s socks: if you observe one sock to be pink you can predict with certainty that the other sock is not pink. Thus you might assume that quantum
entanglement is just the same. However, this is a non-admissible simplification, and Bell in his article explains why.[2]
“}}
linkstream2 microblog 