Posts Tagged ‘from’

RFA – MPI/PI NIH limit

February 28, 2026

the answer… from OSP…

The NIH limitation is by council round, rather than submission date. Council rounds can be found on the NIH standard due dates page: https://grants.nih.gov/grants-process/submit/submission-policies/standard-due-dates

Here is the policy info on the limitation:

https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-25-132.html

Some additional guidance (including a table to show which deadlines fit into which year) can be found on the OSP website: https://research-support.yale.edu/sponsored-projects/office-of-sponsored-projects/proposals

Calendar Year 2026

Advisory Council Dates Application Due Date Notes
January 5/25/25-9/7/25 Not included in the count
May 9/25/25-1/7/26 Included in CY 26 count
August or October 1/25/26-5/7/26 Included in CY 26 count

Calendar Year 2027

Advisory Council Dates Application Due Dates Notes
January 5/25/26-9/7/26 Included in CY 27 count
May 9/25/26-1/7/27 Included in CY 27 count
August or October 1/25/27-5/7/27 Included in CY 27 count

Receipt dates:
9/25/2025-5/7/26 6 max

Receipt dates:
5/25-2026 -5/7/27 6 max

MCB111 Mathematics in Biology

February 22, 2026

http://mcb111.org/w06/w06-lecture.html
Has some nice textbook downloads – e.g.
http://mcb111.org/w06/KollerFriedman.pdf

QT:{{”
There are many good books to learn about probabilistic models. “Probabilistic graphical models: principles and techniques” (by Koller & Friedman) is a comprehensive source about more general probabilistic models than the one we are going to study here.
“}}
Subset of chap 7 focuses on GMRF

Send ppt from our chat

February 22, 2026

good tutorial/textbook chaper/review paper on Poisson regression :

Below are a few readings that discuss how to fit a generalized linear mixed model.

1. Breslow & Clayton (1993), JASA, Approximate Inference in
Generalized Linear Mixed Models.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2290687
A classic statistical paper introducing the Laplace approximation and penalized quasi-likelihood for GLMMs

2. Bates (2011), Mixed models in R using the lme4 package Part 5: Generalized linear mixed models
https://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/slides/2011-03-16-Amsterdam/5GLMMH.pdf 3. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of statistical software, 67, 1-48.
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
4. Bates (2025), Computational methods for mixed models
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/vignettes/Theory.pdf

These are written by the authors of the lme4 package, discussing the details of how a mixed-effects model (more specifically, a generalized linear mixed-effects model) is trained using the PIRLS approach.

Master Equation Notes – Following Up on Your Questions

February 22, 2026

1. Paulsson (2005) – “Models of stochastic gene expression”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1571064505000138 Nice pedagogical review of the master equation framework – covers the conceptual foundations and different analytical approaches.

2. Shahrezaei & Swain (2008) – “Analytical distributions for stochastic gene expression”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18988743/
This one derives the exact analytical solutions to the master equation for protein/mRNA distributions.

The Paulsson paper is probably better as a tutorial.
However, it’s a bit difficult to connect to protein & mRNA.

Flex Seal Draft and Insulation Sealing Tape, Flexible, Rubberized, Weatherproof Strip for Windows, Doors, Vents, Works on Wood, Glass, Tile, Metal, Plastic, Fiberglass, Clear, 2 in x 16 ft, Pack of 1 – Amazon.com

February 15, 2026

AB77
https://www.amazon.com/Flex-Seal-Insulation-Rubberized-Weatherproof/dp/B0FTGJHKRL QT:{{”
About this item
2” wide coverage – excellent for sealing wide gaps.
Strong adhesion – stays put through rain, wind, and extreme temperatures. Flexible rubberize edge maintains shape and seals tight, without cracking. Weather and moisture resistant – use indoors or outdoors.
Clear protection – blends in seamlessly almost anywhere.
Easy application – just cut, peel, and stick.
***Removes cleanly, repositionable, and ready for reuse.
….
Brand Name Flex Seal
UPC 810129872316
Manufacturer Swift Response, LLC
Item Type Name Sealing Tape
Included Components Flex Seal Draft and Insulation Tape, Clear, 2 in x 16 ft “}}

Watch “let’s make a heart-shaped jelly ❤️❤️❤️ #dessert #satisfying #jelly #sweet #cake #jelly cake” on YouTube

February 15, 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/Mqf02erdHLo?si=VJv1HS6e8lPAe2CO

Exclusive: Have scientists found Leonardo da Vinci’s DNA? | Science | AAAS

February 4, 2026

I think you should definitely contact her for professional meeting (and then ask about Sophie possibly meeting with her and learning)

On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 5:40 PM Mark Gerstein <mark> wrote:

QT: {{"
The hunt for Leonardo’s DNA has been a high-profile proving ground for
“arteomics,” an emerging field that could transform how the art world
authenticates and protects its most precious objects (see sidebar,
below). Today, authorship decisions hinge on expert opinion on, for
example, how a brushstroke was made. “Connoisseurship is still what
counts,” says LDVP chair Jesse Ausubel, an environmental scientist at
Rockefeller University who previously led a major project to census
the diversity of marine life.

With human Y chromosome and other nuclear DNA sequences from both the
drawing and the letters in hand, the LDVP team approached Lee, a Y
chromosome expert, in late 2024. Lee was intrigued, and LDVP sent him
blinded sequence data from swabs of Holy Child, several Frosino
letters, and the cheeks of the scientists who sampled the materials.
….
Lee, Loftus, and Jackson geneticist Pille Hallast compared the
sequences with a panel of some 90,000 known markers—changes in
individual base pairs—that group Y chromosome sequences into lineages
called haplogroups. Four samples from Holy Child and the Frosino
letters could be reliably assigned a haplogroup—and they all converged
on E1b1b, a lineage found in the Tuscany area that Leonardo’s extended
family might have carried.
….
When Andrew Miranker peers at a Blakelock canvas, he sees more than
brushwork and varnish. He sees a molecular archive. “Paint is a
recording device,” says Miranker, a biophysicist at Yale University.
As oil paint slowly cures, it traps fragments of DNA—human, animal,
microbial—along with the dust and air of a studio. By interrogating
vanishingly small samples of the strata on supposed Blakelock
canvases, Miranker’s team hopes to uncover clues to whether they were
done by the artist himself or a clever forger.
….
For instance, minuscule paint flakes from an oil painting of a family
farmhouse by John Fairbanks, an American artist from the turn of the
20th century, yielded genetic signatures of farm animals, a dog, and
regional crops such as wheat and clover.

DNA often gets star billing, but proteins can also be telling, says
Julie Arslanoglu, an organic chemist at the Metropolitan Museum of Art
who co-founded Art Bio Matters, an international consortium decoding
molecular signatures in art.

She and University of Bordeaux analytical chemist Caroline Tokarski, a
pioneer in applying proteomic analysis to artworks, probed a
long-standing puzzle about 18th century English artist Thomas
Gainsborough. …. In 1773, Gainsborough wrote to a friend describing
a “secret recipe” for preventing smoke’s dimming effects: He dipped
drawings in skim milk.

To test that claim, the Met-Bordeaux team analyzed rubbings from
Gainsborough drawings in the Morgan Library & Museum. Their results,
published in Heritage Science in 2020, confirmed the legend: The
coating on Gainsborough’s sketches, including Hilly Landscape with
Cows on the Road, contained bovine milk proteins, especially casein.
But exactly how the artist applied the skim milk—and why it
helped—remains a riddle.

"}}

https://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-met/conservation-and-scientific-research/scientific-research/arche

https://www.science.org/content/article/have-scientists-found-leonardo-da-vinci-s-dna

Exclusive: Have scientists found Leonardo da Vinci’s DNA? | Science | AAAS

February 1, 2026

QT: {{”
The hunt for Leonardo’s DNA has been a high-profile proving ground for “arteomics,” an emerging field that could transform how the art world authenticates and protects its most precious objects (see sidebar, below). Today, authorship decisions hinge on expert opinion on, for example, how a brushstroke was made. “Connoisseurship is still what counts,” says LDVP chair Jesse Ausubel, an environmental scientist at Rockefeller University who previously led a major project to census the diversity of marine life.

With human Y chromosome and other nuclear DNA sequences from both the drawing and the letters in hand, the LDVP team approached Lee, a Y chromosome expert, in late 2024. Lee was intrigued, and LDVP sent him blinded sequence data from swabs of Holy Child, several Frosino letters, and the cheeks of the scientists who sampled the materials. ….
Lee, Loftus, and Jackson geneticist Pille Hallast compared the sequences with a panel of some 90,000 known markers—changes in individual base pairs—that group Y chromosome sequences into lineages called haplogroups. Four samples from Holy Child and the Frosino letters could be reliably assigned a haplogroup—and they all converged on E1b1b, a lineage found in the Tuscany area that Leonardo’s extended family might have carried.
….
When Andrew Miranker peers at a Blakelock canvas, he sees more than brushwork and varnish. He sees a molecular archive. “Paint is a recording device,” says Miranker, a biophysicist at Yale University. As oil paint slowly cures, it traps fragments of DNA—human, animal, microbial—along with the dust and air of a studio. By interrogating vanishingly small samples of the strata on supposed Blakelock canvases, Miranker’s team hopes to uncover clues to whether they were done by the artist himself or a clever forger.
….
For instance, minuscule paint flakes from an oil painting of a family farmhouse by John Fairbanks, an American artist from the turn of the 20th century, yielded genetic signatures of farm animals, a dog, and regional crops such as wheat and clover.

DNA often gets star billing, but proteins can also be telling, says Julie Arslanoglu, an organic chemist at the Metropolitan Museum of Art who co-founded Art Bio Matters, an international consortium decoding molecular signatures in art.

She and University of Bordeaux analytical chemist Caroline Tokarski, a pioneer in applying proteomic analysis to artworks, probed a long-standing puzzle about 18th century English artist Thomas Gainsborough. …. In 1773, Gainsborough wrote to a friend describing a “secret recipe” for preventing smoke’s dimming effects: He dipped drawings in skim milk.

To test that claim, the Met-Bordeaux team analyzed rubbings from Gainsborough drawings in the Morgan Library & Museum. Their results, published in Heritage Science in 2020, confirmed the legend: The coating on Gainsborough’s sketches, including Hilly Landscape with Cows on the Road, contained bovine milk proteins, especially casein. But exactly how the artist applied the skim milk—and why it
helped—remains a riddle.

“}}

https://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-met/conservation-and-scientific-research/scientific-research/arche

https://www.science.org/content/article/have-scientists-found-leonardo-da-vinci-s-dna

Exclusive: Have scientists found Leonardo da Vinci’s DNA? | Science | AAAS

January 31, 2026

https://www.science.org/content/article/have-scientists-found-leonardo-da-vinci-s-dna

QT:{{”
The hunt for Leonardo’s DNA has been a high-profile proving ground for “arteomics,” an emerging field that could transform how the art world authenticates and protects its most precious objects (see sidebar, below). Today, authorship decisions hinge on expert opinion on, for example, how a brushstroke was made. “Connoisseurship is still what counts,” says LDVP chair Jesse Ausubel, an environmental scientist at Rockefeller University who previously led a major project to census the diversity of marine life.

Moonlight shimmers strangely in the landscape paintings of Ralph Albert Blakelock.

When Andrew Miranker peers at a Blakelock canvas, he sees more than brushwork and varnish. He sees a molecular archive. “Paint is a recording device,” says Miranker, a biophysicist at Yale University. As oil paint slowly cures, it traps fragments of DNA—human, animal, microbial—along with the dust and air of a studio. By interrogating vanishingly small samples of the strata on supposed Blakelock canvases, Miranker’s team hopes to uncover clues to whether they were done by the artist himself or a clever forger.
“}}

Nature medcine “A minimally invasive dried blood spot biomarker test for the detection of Alzheimer’s dis ease pathology”

January 26, 2026

QT:{{”
The DROP-AD project investigates the potential of dried plasma spot (DPS) and dried blood spot (DBS) analysis, derived from capillary blood, for detecting AD biomarkers, including phosphorylated tau at amino acid 217 (p-tau217), glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light. …. Similarly, we demonstrated the successful detection of glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light with strong correlations between DBS and DPS, respectively, using paired venous plasma samples.
“}}

Might find this paper very interesting. Just published this month in Nature Medicine. “A minimally invasive dried blood spot biomarker test for the detection of Alzheimer’s disease pathology.”

A minimally invasive dried blood spot biomarker test for the detection of Alzheimer’s disease pathology – Nature Medicine
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-04080-0