Posts Tagged ‘from’
The ethical questions that haunt facial-recognition research
November 22, 2020Resisting the rise of facial recognition
November 22, 2020Why do COVID death rates seem to be falling?
November 22, 2020Science is getting harder to read | Nature Index
November 11, 2020simple but interesting textual analysis
https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/science-research-papers-getting-harder-to-read-acronyms-jargon
When you browse Instagram and find former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s passport number
October 5, 2020this is quite interesting privacy leak
The weird physics of upside down buoyancy – YouTube
September 18, 2020Black Rock State Park (Watertown) – 2020 All You Need to Know BEFORE You Go (with Photos) – Tripadvisor
September 14, 2020Also Chatfield Hollow State Park
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:52 AM Mark Gerstein <mark> wrote:
Black Rock State Park (Watertown) – 2020 All You Need to Know BEFORE You Go (with Photos) – Tripadvisor
September 14, 2020Branford Parks and Recreation Department: Online Registration by MyRec.com Recreation Management Software
September 13, 2020When did people arrive in the Americas? New evidence stokes debate
September 6, 2020QT from Nature podcast:{{”
I mean first of all, I think we do have a big problem with deliberate outright fraud, but that’s a kind of separate thing from what happens much more commonly. I think there’s a much more common, and in some ways much more kind of insidious because it’s so widespread, problem of bias towards finding exciting, statistically significant results in the literature. So, if you look at the scientific literature, a huge proportion of the findings that are published there are positive results, right, way more than we would expect. In one study, it’s something like over 90% or maybe even more that.
“}}
22 July 2020
linkstream2 microblog 