https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12701331/
Barabási, A., & Bonabeau, E. (2003). Scale-Free networks. Scientific American, 288(5), 60–69.
https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0503-60
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12701331/
Barabási, A., & Bonabeau, E. (2003). Scale-Free networks. Scientific American, 288(5), 60–69.
https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0503-60
https://www.science.org/content/podcast/bats-surf-storm-fronts-and-public-perception-preprints
https://www.library.ucsb.edu/what-white-house-open-access-publishing-guidance-means-uc-researchers
QT:{{”
JB: Yeah. Actually all of the US agencies that fund research and spend more than a certain level a year have required since the year 2013 that their grantees host the manuscripts resulting from this funded work in public repositories. Because the research was funded with taxpayers money and the public had a right to read the results. There was a compromise reached in that year where the grantees and their publishers could request an embargo on the public release of these scientific papers of up to 12 months. And this was requested by the publishers for business reasons that they did not want to kind of lose their exclusivity that they have by putting these articles at least initially behind a paywall. Now there’s a new policy that is being finalized as we speak and will be go into effect by the end of this calendar year.
….
0:13:49.9
JB: 2025. And it will require the immediate release in a federal public repository of articles that result from federal funding. So that’s a big change in US policy and one that’s causing some ripples. Researchers and their institutions and publishers are all looking at significant changes to make this happen and not everybody’s happy about it but it’s gonna have potentially a big effect because something like 9% of all of the world’s scientific papers are funded by the US government.
“}}
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adg7492
Cheng, J., Novati, G., Pan, J., Bycroft, C., Žemgulytė, A., Applebaum, T., Pritzel, A., Wong, L. H., Zielinski, M., Sargeant, T., Schneider, R. G., W, A., Senior, Jumper, J., Hassabis, D., Kohli, P., & Avsec, Ž. (2023). Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense. Science, 381(6664).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7492
Levy, A. (2020, January 6). A world without pain. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/01/13/a-world-without-pain
QT:{{”
“When I met Jo for the first time, I was just struck by her,” Cox, an affable forty-year-old with a scruffy beard, told me, one afternoon in his lab at U.C.L. …This imperviousness to pain is what makes her distinct from everyone else with a FAAH mutation. They, like even the most committed stoners, can still get hurt.
Cameron had the same FAAH mutation that many other people have—but there had to be something else at play. The scientists started their inquiry by isolating DNA from her blood, and then analyzing the protein-coding subset of her genome—the part that’s traditionally considered to be significant. “We didn’t really find anything,” Cox said. “So we decided, O.K., why don’t we look across the whole genome for bits that are deleted or duplicated? And, at the time, this new chip was just available, which enabled us to scan the whole genome and look for deletions”—snippets missing from her genetic code. “It was a lucky strike: we found that there was this deletion. But it was distinct from FAAH. It was away from FAAH, just downstream.”
The scientists noticed that the right edge of the deletion overlapped “a gene that was annotated as a pseudogene,” Cox said, and frowned. “Which is a term I don’t like.” A pseudogene is what’s been thought of as genetic detritus—a copy of a gene that’s just sitting there, not doing anything productive. One biochemist I spoke to likened a pseudogene to a rusted-out car you stumble on in the forest—only, in Cameron’s case, they put a key in the ignition and the car turned on. “To call it a pseudogene is misleading, because this is a gene that is expressed—it makes a product, a sequence in the DNA,” Cox said, with excitement. “It’s a real fascinating class of genes which have been severely overlooked in genetics until very recently.” Cox and his colleagues named this particular pseudogene—“It’s nicer to call it a gene,” he insisted—FAAH OUT. “It was a wordplay, really,” he said sheepishly. “The challenge now is to understand what it’s doing. Jo is the first person in the world that we know of with this.”
Cameron’s case is important in genetics, partly because it may supply evidence that pseudogenes are more significant than they were previously thought to be.
“}}
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03866-5
QT:{{”
One particular gut microbe is quite the coffee fiend. Lawsonibacter asaccharolyticus was up to eight times more abundant in coffee drinkers than in non-drinkers. In a culture dish, the bacteria grew faster when fed coffee of any kind — brewed or instant, caffeinated or decaffeinated — than when fed no coffee.
“}}
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.08361
Jared Kaplan ∗
Johns Hopkins University, OpenAI
jaredk@jhu.edu
Sam McCandlish∗
OpenAI
sam@openai.com
Tom Henighan
OpenAI
henighan@openai.com
Tom B. Brown
OpenAI
tom@openai.com
Benjamin Chess
OpenAI
bchess@openai.com
Rewon Child
OpenAI
rewon@openai.com
Scott Gray
OpenAI
scott@openai.com
Alec Radford
OpenAI
alec@openai.com
Jeffrey Wu
OpenAI
jeffwu@openai.com
Dario Amodei
OpenAI
damodei@openai.com
https://www.bostonpublicschools.org/Page/8810
Very impressive dashboard with real-time sensor data – perhaps of use
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2313581121
Kogan, V., Molodtsov, I., Fleyshman, D. I., Leontieva, O. V., Koman, I. E., & Gudkov, A. V. (2024). The reconstruction of evolutionary dynamics of processed pseudogenes indicates deep silencing of “retrobiome” in naked mole rat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(45). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313581121