https://www.mydcsi.com/2022/11/14/benefits-of-aquaphor-on-face-2
Benefits of Aquaphor on Face – MyDCSI
May 15, 2023Opinion | Soft Pants: The Post-Pandemic Benefit That’s Here to Stay – The New York Times
May 14, 2023The inside story of ChatGPT: How OpenAI founder Sam Altman built the world’s hottest technology with bill ions from Microsoft | Fortune
May 13, 2023https://archive.ph/2023.01.25-131857/https://fortune.com/longform/chatgpt-openai-sam-altman-microsoft/ https://archive.ph/rRvx1
Can A.I. Treat Mental Illness? | The New Yorker
May 13, 2023Robert Lawrence | Harvard Kennedy School
May 13, 2023“If You Understand How the Brain Works, You Can Reach Anyone”
May 13, 2023https://hbr.org/2017/03/if-you-understand-how-the-brain-works-you-can-reach-anyone
Beard, Alison. (2017). If You Understand How the Brain Works, You Can Reach Anybody. Harvard Business Review, Mar/Apr 2017, Vol. 95 Issue 2, p 60‐62.
QT:{{”
People who express certain genes in the dopamine system tend to be curious, creative, spontaneous, energetic, and mentally flexible. They are risk-takers and seek novelty. People who have high serotonin activity (or who take SSRI antidepressants) are more sociable, more eager to belong. They’re quite traditional in their values and less inclined toward exploration. People expressive of the testosterone system are tough-minded, direct, decisive, skeptical, and assertive. They tend to be good at what we called rule-based systems—engineering, computers, mechanics, math, and music. And people who are expressive of the estrogen/oxytocin system tend to be intuitive, imaginative, trusting, empathetic, and contextual long-term thinkers. They are sensitive to people’s feelings, too, and typically have good verbal and social skills.
“}}
Kickstand For Trek Road Bike – Cycling Kinetics
May 13, 2023Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time
May 12, 2023also the economist :
Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive
the NYT also had a write-up about this recently (linked below). Although it’s interesting, sometimes ‘disruptive’ science is over-hyped and over-valued, whereas incremental science can be under-appreciated.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/17/science/science-breakthroughs-disruption.html
but it is an interesting paper recently published:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05543-x
How AI could change computing, culture and the course of history | The Economist
May 12, 2023QT:{{”
As a way of presenting knowledge, llms promise to take both the practical and personal side of books further, in some cases abolishing them altogether. An obvious application of the technology is to turn bodies of knowledge into subject matter for chatbots. Rather than reading a corpus of text, you will question an entity trained on it and get responses based on what the text says. Why turn pages when you can interrogate a work as a whole?
“}}
linkstream2 microblog 