Posts Tagged ‘cancer’

Genetic errors identified in 12 major cancer types

November 27, 2013

Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major #cancer types: Common genes mutated in different cancers
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v502/n7471/full/nature12634.html

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131016132143.htm

Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v502/n7471/full/nature12634.html

Epigenomic alterations in localized and advanced prostate cancer – Neoplasia

November 27, 2013

Summary for:

“Epigenomic Alterations in Localized and Advanced Prostate Cancer” Lin PC, Giannopoulou E, Park K, Mosquera JM, Sboner A, Tewari AK, Garraway LA, Beltran H, Rubin MA*, Elemento O*. 2013. Epigenomic alterations in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Neoplasia

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555183

In this paper, the authors take advantage of new advances in reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, a method for measuring DNA methylation patterns genome-wide, with high coverage and
single-nucleotide resolution, to study methylation patterns in prostate cancer. Working with a prostate cancer cohort already studied with DNA-Seq and RNA-Seq analyses, the authors identified
differentially methylated regions (DMRs), comparing the methylation of prostate cancer samples to benign prostate samples. The analysis found an increase in DNA methylation in prostate cancer samples, and that the methylation was more diverse and heterogeneous compared to the patterns of benign samples. Furthermore, it was found that genes near hypermethylated DMRs tended to have decreased expression, while genes near hypomethylated DMRs tended to have increased expression. Additional analyses revealed that breakpoints associated with prostate-cancer-specific deletions, duplications, and translocations tended to be highly methylated in benign prostate tissue. Finally, a study of CpG islands at different stages of prostate cancer (benign vs. PCa vs. CRPC (castration-resistant prostate cancer)) revealed that certain islands become increasingly methylated with disease severity. The authors used this data as the basis for two classification models: one to discriminate between benign prostate tissue and PCa tissue, and another to discriminate between PCa tissue and CRPC tissue. Both models demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, indicating that CpG islands with high discriminatory power could serve as a diagnostic basis for predicting disease aggressiveness. Finally, additional analyses revealed that breakpoints associated with
prostate-cancer-specific deletions, duplications, and translocations tended to be highly methylated in benign prostate tissue.

TCGA Toolbox and Roadmap Dashboard

October 13, 2013

http://tcga.github.io/
http://tcga.github.io/Roadmap

CiteULike: Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers

October 12, 2013

http://www.citeulike.org/user/neils/article/12718324?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Whole-genome reconstruction and mutational signatures in gastric cancer – Genome Biol.

October 12, 2013

Genome Biol. 2012 Dec 13;13(12):R115.

Whole-genome reconstruction and mutational signatures in gastric cancer. Nagarajan N, Bertrand D, Hillmer AM, Zang ZJ, Yao F, Jacques PE, Teo AS, Cutcutache I, Zhang Z, Lee WH, Sia YY, Gao S, Ariyaratne PN, Ho A, Woo XY, Veeravali L, Ong CK, Deng N, Desai KV, Khor CC, Hibberd ML, Shahab A, Rao J, Wu M, Teh M, Zhu F, Chin SY, Pang B, So JB, Bourque G, Soong R, Sung WK, Tean Teh B, Rozen S, Ruan X, Yeoh KG, Tan PB, Ruan Y.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23237666

Some thoughts, much from WC:

Looks like the data is freely available via GEO ID : GSE30833 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE30833

The article by Nagarajan et al. highlights the authors efforts to utilize de novo genome assembly of gastric cancer genomes to detect not only single nucleotide variants (SNV’s) and short
insertions/deletions (indels), but also larger scale genomic structural variation (SV) that could be signatures of cancer genomes. It is to be applauded that this is a whole genome analysis.

The authors present several interesting findings such as enrichment for C->A and T->A mutations in both cancer genomes, enrichment for C->A and C->T mutations in the H. pylori infected cancer genome (evidence of cytosine specific transcription mediated DNA repair due to deamination), and amplification and deletion of regions on chromosome 12 in the non-H. pylori infected genome.

Although copy number variants (CNV) could potentially be detected by exome sequencing alone, whole genome sequence enables the precise localization of such events, as well as the detection of variation in non-coding regions.

Their methodology relies on combining high-throughput short-read sequencing with longer DNA-PET (paired end tags) in order to construct higher confidence de novo assemblies with longer contiguous regions.

Network-based stratification of tumor mutations

September 21, 2013

http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nmeth.2651.html

Network-based stratification of tumor mutations

Matan Hofree,
John P Shen,
Hannah Carter,
Andrew Gross
& Trey Ideker

Nature Methods(2013)doi:10.1038/nmeth.2651

latest Nature paper with cancer data

August 21, 2013

500 whole-genome cancer sequences

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature12477.html

Cancer Risk Increases With Height – NYTimes.com

August 5, 2013

Cancer Risk Increases With Height: +4-inch in height => +13% in risk for developing any #cancer
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/25/cancer-risk-increases-with-height #health via @nytimes

QT:”
They found that for every 4-inch change in height, there was a 13 percent increase in risk for developing any type of cancer. The cancers most strongly associated with height were cancers of the kidney, rectum, thyroid and blood. Risk for those cancers increased by 23 to 29 percent for every 4-inch increase in height.

Cancer therapy: Checkpoint Charlie | The Economist

July 24, 2013

MT @hlatim: Checkpoint Charlie | Economist http://bit.ly/137nZLO checkpoint inhibitors for lymphocyte proliferation, which combats #cancer

http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21578986-new-class-drugs-being-deployed-struggle-against-cancer-checkpoint

The Exomes of the NCI-60 Panel: A Genomic Resource for Cancer Biology and Systems Pharmacology

July 20, 2013

The Exomes of the NCI-60 Panel: A Genomic Resource for Cancer Biology and Systems Pharmacology
Cancer Res July 15, 2013 73:4372-4382; Published OnlineFirst July 15, 2013; http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/73/14/4372.long