Posts Tagged ‘funding’

How Long Can the U.S. Stay on Top?

December 15, 2013

How Long Can the US Stay on Top? Universities are increasingly tied to #philanthropy vs federal & state #funding
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6139/1394.summary

Robber Baron University: Stanford, JHU, Rockefeller, CMU, Vanderbilt, Rice, Drexel

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6139/1394.summary

GEN | News Highlights:NIH Ushering Genome Sequencing Toward the Clinic with Grants Totaling $27M

July 27, 2013

http://www.genengnews.com/gen-news-highlights/nih-ushering-genome-sequencing-toward-the-clinic-with-grants-totaling-27m/81248635/

PAR-11-203: Predictive Multiscale Models for Biomedical, Biological, Behavioral, Environmental and Clinical Research (Interagency U01)

July 27, 2013

http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-11-203.html
interesting mechanism that seems to involve NIH, DOE, NSF, &c

NHGRI to Unveil Funding for Tools to Interpret Non-coding Genomic Regions

May 25, 2013

http://www.genomeweb.com/informatics/nhgri-unveil-funding-tools-interpret-non-coding-genomic-regions?hq_e=el&hq_m=1584748&hq_l=8&hq_v=f72372352c

breakthrough prize winners

March 1, 2013

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2013/feb/20/breakthrough-prize-silicon-valley-entrepreneurs Lander, Botstein, Vogelstein and Cornelia Bargmann…Lewis Cantley, "I almost fell over. I didn’t even know this prize existed." He turned 64 on Wednesday.

Project Seeks to Build Map of Human Brain – NYTimes.com

February 18, 2013

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/18/science/project-seeks-to-build-map-of-human-brain.html?_r=0&pagewanted=all

Scientific publishing: Brought to book | The Economist

November 3, 2012

http://www.economist.com/node/21559317

2010 Academic R&D Spending Trends | C&EN

October 29, 2012

Comparatively low spending on chemistry at Yale
http://cen.acs.org/articles/90/i43/2010-Academic-RD-Spending-Trends.html http://cen.acs.org/content/dam/cen/90/43/09043-scitech1.pdf

Presidents commision on bioethics releases report on genomics and privacy

October 20, 2012

http://www.bioethics.gov

cites Greenbaum et al. PLOS CB (’11)!

3 options for handling preliminary results in New NIH format (Significance, Innovation, Approach)

October 14, 2012

http://www.bridgew.edu/sponproj/SigInnovApproachSections.pdf
http://www2.astate.edu/a/research-transfer/Docs/TipsonWritingaCompetitiveNIHGrantProposal.pdf

Option 1, pending any clarification

* Significance
* Innovation
* Approach
– Preliminary Studies supporting Aims
– Aim 1
– Aim 2
– Aim 3

Option 2

* Aim 1
– Significance, Innovation, Approach
* Aim 2
– Significance, Innovation, Approach
* Aim 3
– Significance, Innovation, Approach
* Preliminary Studies/Progress Report

Option 3

* Aim 1: Preliminary studies, Significance, Innovation,
Approach
* Aim 2: Preliminary studies, Significance, Innovation,
Approach
* Aim 3: Preliminary studies, Significance, Innovation,
Approach

12 pages for Sig. + Innov. + Approach
1 pages for Spec. Aims