Posts Tagged ‘l2e’

NYTimes: ‘Breathtaking,’ ‘Devastating’: Mathematics Reels After New OpenAI Release

October 24, 2026

I wrote the following paragraph in response to this:
{{”
I read with great interest the article about the profound disruptions new developments in AI are bringing to mathematics, and the anxiety is this causing mathematicians (see reference below). However, I don’t see this disruption as qualitatively different from the many technological upheavals that have come before. Is this a bigger deal than the advent of digital computers and calculators, which replaced legions of people doing long arithmetic by hand? Is it bigger than computers surpassing the best human chess players? Or GPS eliminating the need for map reading skills? One could go back further, to the advent of the printing press, which displaced a longer verbal tradition where people stored knowledge through interaction and conversation. These technologies displaced particular human skills, but they did not eliminate the larger intellectual traditions in which those skills existed. However remarkable the new AI capabilities in mathematics are, I suspect mathematics will adapt to them, just as it has in the past.
“}}

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MORE DETAIL ON ARTICLE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NYTimes: ‘Breathtaking,’ ‘Devastating’: Mathematics Reels After New OpenAI Release
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/08/science/mathematicians-respond-openai-release.html By Siobhan Roberts
Oct. 8, 2026

In Turning to Trade School, Gen Z Confronts an Enduring Stigma

August 22, 2026

A letter I wrote in response to this piece : {{

I read the recent NY Times article, “Mom, Dad, I Want to Be a Welder,” with great interest. It describes a growing number of young people choosing skilled trades over traditional white-collar careers. One of the motivations they cite is the belief that occupations requiring manual dexterity are less likely to be displaced by AI than office work. This strikes me as reasonable. AI has already demonstrated remarkable success at many tasks long considered hallmarks of white-collar expertise: scoring highly on medical examinations, drafting legal documents, solving difficult mathematical problems, and writing software. By contrast, robots still struggle with the manual dexterity required for many everyday physical tasks, such as tying shoelaces.

Yet there is an irony here. Traditionally, blue-collar workers report to white-collar managers. If AI increasingly takes over white-collar functions, we could find ourselves in a future where large numbers of human tradespeople report to organizations whose scheduling, dispatching, performance evaluation, and even hiring are increasingly directed by AIs. In that sense, AI may not directly replace the electrician, plumber, or welder, but it may still reshape—and increasingly govern—the environment in which they work.

}}

In Turning to Trade School, Gen Z Confronts an Enduring Stigma – The
New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/13/style/gen-z-trade-school-careers-ai-college.html

Opinion | I’m Begging You: Never Write With A.I.

August 22, 2026

A letter I wrote in response to this:
{{”
I read Bret Stephens’ recent editorial about why we shouldn’t use AI for writing with great interest. It was a wonderfully written piece. However, I disagree with it. Stephens has the luxury of telling us not to use AI for writing because he’s such a good writer himself. What about all the people who can’t write as well as he can and for whom AI is beneficial, particularly non-native English speakers?

I like to compare AI writing to an elevator. It’s easy for a person who is in great athletic shape to say, “Don’t take the elevator. It’s great exercise to walk upstairs.” But many people need elevators and simply can’t make it upstairs. Furthermore, the advent of the elevator helps even fit people reach new building heights that simply would not be possible under their own power. In a similar way, I think AI will allow us to create things – both written and beyond – that are simply beyond unassisted human power.

So while I thought Stephens’ piece was great, it’s time for skilled writers to embrace the progress of AI — and not resent it.
“}}

Opinion | I’m Begging You: Never Write With A.I. – The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/opinion/artificial-intelligence-ai-writing.html Bret Stephens’ recent editorial

In Turning to Trade School, Gen Z Confronts an Enduring Stigma

July 19, 2026

In Turning to Trade School, Gen Z Confronts an Enduring Stigma – The
New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/13/style/gen-z-trade-school-careers-ai-college.html

What the Science of Touch Says About Us

June 27, 2016

Feel Me by @AdamGopnik
http://www.NewYorker.com/magazine/2016/05/16/what-the-science-of-touch-says-about-us It’s easier for AI to win at chess than move pieces on the board – cf http://www.NYTimes.com/1997/05/13/opinion/l-how-smart-can-it-be-084328.html

Sensory Studies
MAY 16, 2016 ISSUE
Feel Me
What the new science of touch says about ourselves.
BY ADAM GOPNIK

QT:{{”
““Haptic intelligence is vital to human intelligence,” she concludes. “It’s not just dexterity. It’s finding your way in the world: it’s embodiment, emotion, attack. Haptic intelligence is human
intelligence. We’re just so smart with it that we don’t know it yet. It’s actually much harder to make a chess piece move correctly—to pick up the piece and move it across the board and put it down
properly—than it is to make the right chess move.” She adds, slyly, “When I took A.I. as a student, I was so dismayed to find that most A.I. is just stupid brute force, just running through the
possibilities a machine can look at quickly. Computer chess looks intelligent, but it’s under-the-hood stupid. Reaching and elegantly picking up the right chess piece fluidly and having it land in the right place in an uncontrolled environment—that’s hard. Haptic intelligence is an almost irreproducible miracle! Because people are so good at that, they don’t appreciate it. Machines are good at finding the next move, but moving in the world still baffles them.”” “}}

Genetic Testing May Be Coming to Your Office – WSJ

December 18, 2015

Genetic Testing May Be Coming to Your Office http://www.wsj.com/articles/genetic-testing-may-be-coming-to-your-office-1450227295 Insurance may monetize #PersonalGenomics as advertising did for the Web

‘Devious Defecator’ Case Tests Genetics Law

June 5, 2015

Devious Defecator Case Tests Genetics Law http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/02/health/devious-defecator-case-tests-genetics-law.html Non-obvious outcome of GINA protects employees from non-medical DNA testing